Actions
Bug #3500
openHifrog - prop logic: Assertion `clause_in_A || clause_in_B' failed
Start date:
08/09/2016
Due date:
% Done:
100%
Estimated time:
Description
Happens when running all the claims at once. When running this benchmarks one claim after another (3 runs instead of 1), then there is no problem
Code example: /hi-bench/main-bench/funfrog_regression/05_McMillan/diskperf.cil_loopfree.c
; ============================[ Search Statistics ]==============================
; | Conflicts | ORIGINAL | LEARNT | Progress |
; | | Vars Clauses Literals | Limit Clauses Lit/Cl | |
; ===============================================================================
; 0 | 0 0 | 53.660 s | 369.918 MB
SOLVER TIME: 54.877
UNSAT - it holds!
ASSERTION IS TRUE
Start generating interpolants...
- Proof graph building begin
- Memory used before building the proof: 371.594 MB
- (1) Empty clause given in input or generated at preprocessing time: single node proof
- Number of nodes: 1 (leaves: 0 - learnt: 0 - derived: 0 - theory: 0)
- Maximum, average size of leaves: 0 -nan
- Maximum, average size of learnt: 0 -nan
- Number of edges: 0
- Number of distinct variables in the proof: 0
- Memory used after building the proof: 371.941 MB
- Proof graph building end
- Single interpolant
- Using Pudlak for propositional interpolation
evolcheck: PGInterAux.C:210: opensmt::icolor_t ProofGraph::getClauseColor(const ipartitions_t&, const ipartitions_t&): Assertion `clause_in_A || clause_in_B' failed.
Aborted (core dumped)
Updated by Antti Hyvärinen over 8 years ago
- Status changed from New to Resolved
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
Seems to be working now in hi frog / master and opensmt2 / master
Actions